Art of a Logo

THERE’S NOT MUCH going on this week. I suppose we could be talking about the new — and quite maddeningly vague — security rules affecting passengers arriving in the U.S. from overseas, but there’s little to be said that hasn’t been said a hundred times in these pages. If you feel that handing out questionnaires to departing passengers is a legitimate means of thwarting terrorists, and a useful way of spending resources, well good luck to you.

But the heck with that. Instead of some frustrating rant about security, let’s get nostalgic and return to one of my perennial favorite subjects: airline logos.

What brings me to this topic yet again is Walter Isaacson’s splashy new book out about the life and work of Leonardo da Vinci, history’s most prolific artist-thinker-tinkerer. If that strikes you as the most baffling non-sequitir you’ve ever heard, then you’re too young to remember the old, 1970s-era livery of All Nippon Airways, which looked like this…

It’s without irony that the logo of All Nippon depicted Leonardo’s 16th century “helicopter” design — a corkscrewing flying machine that, while an impressive statement of the artist’s vision and intellect, could never have gotten off the ground.

That’s a hard sentiment to pin down. Were they just being cheeky, or was it something deeply respectful and reflective — a logo that symbolized four-hundred years worth of dream and ambition, a culmination of the journey from theoretical flying machine to the Lockheed L-1011? Whatever it was, it was the sort of incredibly cool logo that no airline in 2017 would ever consider using. It’s too intense, too esoteric, too meaningful in an age where corporate identity is sought not through meaning or concept, but through garish colors and swoopy things.

Similarly, perhaps my all-time favorite tail design was the one used by British Airways around that same period. The tail was this one, seen here on a 747…

As the kids today would say, that tail is dope. I’m not sure there’s ever been a better one. It’s so rakish, streamlined, and the angles so perfectly complement the angles of the airplane itself. And there’s something so undefinably British about it. Indeed, if it seems there’s something Union Jack-ish about it, that’s because the design is lifted directly from the banner. Look closely at the flag…

Do you see it?

Okay now scroll down.

How’s that for clever?

No, they don’t do airline liveries like they used to. Not for the most part, anyway. I’m a sucker for those that at least make an effort to incorporate some sort of cultural or historical message, and fortunately there are still a few out there. Aeromexico’s Aztec-inspired “eagle knight,” for instance, is a great example, and JAL’s tsurumaru crane is the prettiest thing in the sky. EgyptAir’s falcon-headed Horus is maybe the ugliest thing in the sky, but at least it means something.

The best ones, maybe, are the ones where you need The Google to help you out. I’m thinking especially of Iran Air’s peculiar logo. Inspired by the character of Homa, a kind of bird-horse-cow griffin carved on the columns at the ancient Persian site of Persepolis, the symbol was designed 1961 by a 22 year-old Iranian art student named Edward Zohrabian, and has been used ever since. How many companies have stuck with the same logo for 56 years?

Iran Air is in the midst of transition, and it’s just a matter of time, I worry, before this enduring mark is dustbinned for some stupid swoosh. Like Leonardo’s copter on the tail at ANA, it’s probably too old-fashioned, if not outright perplexing, by today’s standards. It’s also vaguely fetal and creepy-looking, I agree. But here’s hoping they keep it.

Back to the Ask the Pilot Home Page Visit the Blog Archive Back to Top!

Leave a Comment to George

Maximum 1500 characters. Watch your spelling and grammar. Poorly written posts will be deleted!

33 Responses to “Art of a Logo”
You are viewing newest comments first. Click to reverse order
  1. Lyn Robb says:

    I always love your livery/logo articles Patrick: I find myself casting a more critical eye these days.

    Wanted to comment on Qantas’s livery having just returned from a trip to Sydney on the 747-400ER.

    Nothing makes my heart gladly and proudly leap more than seeing that big Kangaroo on the tail — there’s rarely more than 2 planes at a time (LAX usually) but you cannot help but see that tail and it’s stunningly beautiful.

    Here’s some images: this one is the original livery for the 747 that I still love (you need to cut and paste this link separately into your browser):

    https://media1.ausbt.com.au/1500,1500-5469069866cc4741af9b4ba3767f2254-qantas-livery-boeing-747-a.jpg

    And here’s the current livery:

    https://www.qantas.com/img/540×360/qantas-fleet/747-400.jpg

  2. Patrick Montagne Linville says:

    http://www.askthepilot.com/wp-content/uploads/2017 /10/Iran-Air-Griffin.png

    Also reminds me ofthe old Air France “shrimp “

  3. Cameron Beck says:

    Yes, logos are important and so few get them right.

    Or,they have them right then ruin them. American comes to mind. Before, a simple but pleasing orange-ish logo on an unpainted fuselage. Dignified in a military sort of way. Now? That striped tail? Yuck.

    There’s no counting for taste, is there.

    Colors are important of course. In my view, some colors just do not belong on aircraft. Northwest Orient had a hard red as you’ll recall. An earth color, definitely not a flying color.

    Many carriers do have a splash of red, logo or livery. But the jaunty, “light” red, not the heavy iron ore look.

    I can’t think of one which is just totally right. Your BA choice?
    Southwest’s former colors were disgusting in my view. Boring desert. Now they’re almost TOO colorful.

    BA, Air France, KLM come to mind as dignified flying colors. Stately, even. As befits an international, a global.

    WOW. Huh? What was founder Skili Morgensen thinking? Easter Egg Purple. *Sounds of wretching*

    Diversion into WOW service: friends & I recently flew WOW. EVERYTHING, was for sale. i have an artificial knee and it can get stiff. I explained to an FA. Could I move to open Exit row seat? Yes, for $59. That offended me. I moved, paying them nothing. They got their revenge by rolling drinks cart right past me.

    Two words: Never…again.

  4. UncleStu says:

    ” Inspired by the character of Homa, a kind of bird-horse-cow griffin ”

    Looks like a cutesy-pie sea horse with wings. Weird.

    It does not bring Iran to mind.

  5. Matt D says:

    And how could you forget little Reno Air? The three little mountains, which if you look roughly southwesterly from RNO, you will see them. A regional depiction of its home base, which you profess your love of.

    The “A” in “Air” depicted the profile of an airliner wing.

    It retained the classic cheatlines.

    The green and silver colors were a touch of class.

    The “Reno Air” font itself was a bit cheesy, and perhaps could’ve been done differently. But otherwise was a very handsome color scheme.

  6. Tim Simmonds says:

    And there’s the Koru on Air New Zealand.To quote Wikipedia,” It is a stylised representation of a fern frond unfolding, and signifies new life, growth and renewal. The koru was used on the prows of the early Polynesian canoes that sailed the Pacific with its many islands. The koru was first applied to the tail of Air New Zealand aircraft with the arrival of the DC-10 in 1973, and has remained ever since.”Also the new look(2013) has the Silver Fern(N.Z. national symbol and trade mark) on the rear body with a change of colour from Pacific Blue to Kiwi Black.

  7. John Borrego says:

    As to Leonardo’s airscrew: I happen to be reading Walter Isaacson’s biography of the great man. He suggests that this was not meant to be a practical flying machine, but a stage prop. The Medici rulers of Florence were constantly staging plays, pageants, and public spectacles, many of which involved flying angels, falling stars, ascending Christs, fantastic birds and dragons, etc. Leonardo was involved in designing the machinery for these events. Isaacson suggests that the “helicopter” might have been used in one of these presentations, perhaps flown on a hidden cable powered by a spring.

  8. Matt D says:

    One that has always perplexed me: Look up Grand Airways. They were based at Las Vegas and flew a couple of DC-9’s for about five minutes circa 1995 or 1996. What the heck is that tail logo all about? The first thing that comes to mind when I see it is a Japanese Benihana restaurant, not a sunbelt airline flying LAS-DFW/IAH. Look it up and let me know.

    Speaking of LAS, what about the stylized ribbon logo from National Airlines that flew 757’s out of there? I always thought that one was simple. Indeed the livery itself managed to be both simple and yet attractive.

    But for sheer cheesiness, you would have a hard time topping Air 21. The Fresno based airline that also flew….to LAS….also in the mid 90’s, using a pair of Fokker 28’s.

    • Patrick says:

      I don’t know what that Grand Airways thing is. It looks like a beehive.

      As to the LAS-based National Airlines, that ribbon was a little too fancy for its own good, I think. And their typeface was horrible.

      Air 21, though…. cheesy, sure, but how can you not like that one? That strange, retro-futuristic aesthetic, it looks like it’s from a schlocky 1960s movie, or from a comic book.

      • Ad absurdum per aspera says:

        Interesting subject! I actually hadn’t noticed Grand Airways during their brief venture into jetliner service. (Not to be confused with the roughly contemporaneous MGM Grand Air, which offered all-first-class-plus service between LAX and JFK for a while; they looked sharp with a dark-blue livery with the MGM Grand lion on the vertical stabilizer.)

        An airliners.net commenter wrote of Grand Airways, “As [earlier commenter] Lasbagman pointed out, the owner was Sid Siddiqui who I believe was of Middle East or Arabic background. The logo on the tail had something to do with his ethnic background, if I recall correctly.” (http://www.airliners.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=436115)

        Alas, I have no further insight into who Sid Siddiqui is or was in that context. The name is quite old and has spread widely through the Islamic-influenced world, which is nice to know but doesn’t exactly narrow it down. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siddiqui)

        The logo is evocative of, and may represent, an architectural style caled a “beehive house” that is said to be most common in Alawite Syria. (http://www.alamy.com/stock-photo-arab-boy-in-front-of-ancient-beehive-houses-in-syria-18967158.html)

  9. Matt D says:

    One that has always perplexed me: Look up Grand Airways. They were based at Las Vegas and flew a couple of DC-9’s for about five minutes circa 1995 or 1996. What the heck is that tail logo all about? The first thing that comes to mind when I see it is a Japanese Benihana restaurant, not a sunbelt airline flying LAS-DFW/IAH. Look it up and let me know.

    Speaking of LAS, what about the stylized ribbon logo from National Airlines that flew 757’s out of there? I always thought that one was simple. Indeed the livery itself managed to be both simple and yet attractive.

  10. Lurk says:

    Not one with an arcane derivation I know, but I’ll be sad to see the Monarch logo and livery disappear. I thought the crowned “M” worked really well, especially in the more abstract later versions and the combination of black and yellow was pleasantly eye-catching.

  11. Rod says:

    The trouble with the old All Nippon logo is that you have to peer at it and analyse it for a long moment before (hopefully) understanding. That’s fine for a book cover, not an airplane. The beauty of the great logos — the old BA and BEA ones, PanAm, Alitalia for nearly half a century, Air Canada’s original 60s maple leaf nearly encircled (to suggest movement), Swissair’s final Swiss flag (with a chocolate stripe along the fuselage), etc. — is that they are instantly graspable, and beautiful.
    Did I forget Air France? A slightly abstract jet-age slanted version of the French flag. Magnificent.
    http://logodatabases.com/air-france-logo.html/old-air-france-logo
    https://qph.ec.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-5daf8bc1a8ec0c1ff078968c293e6475

  12. DV Henkel-Wallace says:

    What about Air France’s flying seahorse?

  13. George says:

    I tend to think the ANA logo creaters tended more toward respectful, as it has another connection. The helicopter is a nod back to the original corporate name, Japan Helicopter and Aeroplane Transport Co (Nippon Herikoputā Yusō). That’s also where their “NH” IATA airline code comes from. That’s probably too much thought for a “modern” logo, though.

  14. John Borrego says:

    I wonder if the solid red in the upper part of BA’s tail design might be a nod to the “Red Square” of British European Airways, the predecessor company that merged with BOAC to form BA. As to the longevity of logos, Lufthansa’s crane goes back to its previous life as Deutsche Luft-Reederei in 1919.

    • DV Henkel-Wallace says:

      Had not seen the significance of the red top, which likely explains the question I was going to ask which was “why didn’t they use the *upper* left portion of the flag, as the tail is vertical?

    • DV Henkel-Wallace says:

      And of course Lufthansa’s name itself harkens back to the 14th century

    • Mike Richards says:

      I think you’re right in it coming from BEA, but not the red square livery, but it’s successor called the Speedjack with half a Union Flag on the tail which looked something like a red plane in flight.

      When BA was formed in the merger, BEA’s planes kept the Speedjack for a number of years but with British Airways painted on the fuselage. Here it is on a Trident 3 – the world’s only five-engined three-engine airliner:

      https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/53/British_Airways_Trident_Three_G-AWZA.jpg

  15. Paul says:

    With a passion for the obvious, Qantas has used the kangaroo logo since 1944. It grew wings in 1947, but lost them again in 1984, since when changes have been minor.

    https://www.qantas.com/travel/airlines/history-kangaroo-symbol/global/en

    • Richard says:

      I’m biased, but that’s my favourite. Simple, elegant, as you say largely unchanged, and completely recognisable – both as the brand and what it is. Even though I’m not living in Australia anymore, seeing the flying kangaroo still stirs something inside me.

  16. Dan Ullman says:

    I would have to disagree about the BA logo. To me, it looks like something that came from a classroom exercise that was well received as being “deep”. There might be some folks in the United Kingdom that might get the flag symbolism but for most folks it would not have any impact.

    • SirWired says:

      Well, I instantly recognized it as a slice of the Union Jack before Patrick illustrated it; it’s certainly not an obscure flag known only to a few.

  17. Speed says:

    Lets not forget Ed Force One …
    http://tinyurl.com/y8o2uft3

    Detail of vertical stabilizer …
    http://tinyurl.com/y9arzq7e

    With regard to Leonardo’s “corkscrewing flying machine,” propellers were (and occasionally still are) called airscrews.

  18. SirWired says:

    Saw a couple Caribbean Airlines birds yesterday at FLL; it’s classy, though they could use a higher-quality picture of a Hummingbird.

    • phoenix says:

      Check out Azores Airlines and SATA Azores. They use a lovely origami-like rendering of a hummingbird on their tails.

      • Patrick says:

        SATA had a whale motif on the fuselage for a while, too. Or is it there still? SATA flies into BOS, which I believe is its only American destination.

        • phoenix says:

          The baleen whale is painted on Azores’ A330-200 CS-TRY. It’s still in service.

          They caught my eye while I was waiting for my WS flight at YYZ when they served it with an A310, since retired. I thought that was one gorgeous bird when it pulled in!